Brodek v. Farnum
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court; King County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
This was an action for damages for breach of a contract entered into between the plaintiffs and the^ defendants for the erection of a building. The claim for damages is based upon the following grounds, in substance: (1) That the building was not completed within the time contracted for, whereby the plaintiffs lost certain rents; (2) that by the terms of the contract said building was to be constructed so that the first floor should he upon a level with the sidewalk, according to the established grade, and that it was not so constructed, but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shain v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Rush v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Lewis v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Stedeker v. . BernardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Leach v. LambethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Wiley v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- North Pacific Mortgage Co. v. KrewsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Beck v. BoucherWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Frizzell v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.