Legal Opinion

Brodek v. Farnum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1895No. 1593PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court; King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This was an action for damages for breach of a contract entered into between the plaintiffs and the^ defendants for the erection of a building. The claim for damages is based upon the following grounds, in substance: (1) That the building was not completed within the time contracted for, whereby the plaintiffs lost certain rents; (2) that by the terms of the contract said building was to be constructed so that the first floor should he upon a level with the sidewalk, according to the established grade, and that it was not so constructed, but…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shain v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Rush v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Lewis v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Stedeker v. . BernardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Leach v. LambethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wiley v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. North Pacific Mortgage Co. v. KrewsonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Beck v. BoucherWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Frizzell v. MurrayWashington Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API