Frizzell v. Murray
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence
González, J.
¶21 (concurring) — I agree with the majority that Tamara Frizzell has not waived her monetary damages claims. But, then again, I find that Frizzell has not waived any of her claims and has raised sufficient issues of material fact to warrant a hearing on the merits. I write separately to rehabilitate the permissive language in RCW 61.24.040(l)(f)(IX) as it applies to waiver and urge that waiver not be applied when the validity of the underlying deed of trust is called into question. I also write separately to provide guidance to the lower court that will consider the interplay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Miebach v. ColasurdoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Plein v. LackeyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Plein v. LackeyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.