Legal Opinion

Rush v. Thompson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1887No. 13,545PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, C. J.

James W. Thompson, Sr., John W. French and James W. Thompson, Jr., appellees here, brought this action against Frederick P. Eush, George E. Townley and Edward F. Gall, the appellants.

Appellees alleged in their complaint that they were part*159ners doing business under the firm- name of J. W. Thompson & Co., and that appellants, a firm doing business under the firm name of Fred P. Eush & Co., were indebted to them in the sum of $10,552 for wheat sold and delivered.

Appellants filed what purports to be an answer, in four paragraphs: First, a general denial; second, payment. In a third paragraph, as…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Berkshire v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. American Car & Foundry Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Sefton v. HargettIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. McAfee v. BendingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API