Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Pipitone

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1984No. AO16895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

The People appeal from orders of dismissal of various narcotics charges against Ronald Gene Pipitone, Donald Vincent Dorso, Janet Louise Cardoza, David Alan Brown, Susan Evelyn Foley, and Jeffrey Hamilton Seibold.

An information charged all six defendants with possession of cocaine for purposes of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351) and possession of barbiturates (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377). The information also charged Pipitone with possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350), and charged Cardoza with a second count of possession of barbiturates and driving while under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. RosalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. BarkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API