Legal Opinion

People v. Barkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1978No. Crim. 31117PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J. —

His motions to suppress evidence and to reveal the identity of an informer having been denied, defendant, Delores Barkins, entered his guilty plea to a charge of possession of heroin for the purpose of sale. On this appeal from the resulting judgment, he contends: (1) a search which disclosed the heroin is invalid because a consent to search imposed as a condition of probation in a prior conviction had terminated by reason of a trial court order “revoking” probation; and (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion to reveal the identity of the informer.

We conclude:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. United States v. Midwest Video Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. People v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. HaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. People v. TrumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API