Nielsen v. Department of Licensing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.
¶1 Washington’s implied consent law provides for the revocation of a licensee’s driver’s license where the licensee is arrested for driving while under the influence and refuses to submit to a blood or breath alcohol test. The law provides such licensees with procedural protections, including the right to appeal to the superior court from an administrative license revocation. Following license revocation, the licensee can apply for an ignition interlock driver’s license (IIDL), which allows the licensee to lawfully operate a motor vehicle during the revocation. However, the IIDL statute…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Didlake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington, V Wyatt Taylor SewardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Karen A. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Lucid Group Usa, V State LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.