Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, V Wyatt Taylor Seward

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 1, 2016No. 47581-2-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.

¶1 Wyatt Taylor Seward appeals the imposition of legal financial obligations (LFOs) following his guilty plea conviction for second degree assault. He argues that (1) the imposition of mandatory LFOs under RCW 43.43.7541 (deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee), RCW 7.68.035 (victim penalty assessment (VPA)), and RCW 36.18.020(2)(h) (filing fee) without first considering his current or likely future ability to pay violated his substantive due process rights, (2) the LFO collection process does not comply with the constitutional safeguards established in State v. Blank, 131 Wn.2d 230, 930…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BlazinaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Of Washington, V Michael Ray HornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  2. State Of Washington v. Karen A. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Abdullah Hassan EkriemCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington v. Darrell K. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State Of Washington v. Hassen JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API