Legal Opinion
Jay-Arr Slimwear Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 18, 1988No. Court 85-01-00003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
This matter is before the Court, after trial, to determine whether certain payments representing commissions and consular fees were properly considered dutiable in the appraisement of the imported merchandise; and whether the imported merchandise consisting of brassieres with a lace edging, were properly classified as ornamented garments.
BACKGROUND
At trial plaintiff produced two witnesses, the first of whom was Mr. Jack Rosen-baum, the president of Jay-Arr Slimwear. According to his testimony, plaintiff shipped precut fabric and accessories to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dorf International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Blairmoor Knitwear Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moss Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- First State Bank v. Diamond Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Monarch Luggage Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989