McQuisten v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Case by William D. McQuisten, administrator of the estate of Peter Trudell, deceased, against the Detroit Citizens’ Street-Railway Company for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. There was judgment for defendant, notwithstanding a verdict for plaintiff, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This action is brought to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, who was instantly killed by a car of defendant company, March 2, 1895. After plaintiff’s testimony was in, and also at the close of the testimony for defendant, a motion was made to take the case from the jury. These motions were overruled. The case was submitted to the jury- by the trial judge,' *68and a verdict of $3,500 was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. When the case was submitted to the jury, it was agreed that, if the trial judge should later conclude he ought to have directed a verdict for defendant, he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chauvin v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- La Londe v. Trans St. Mary's Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Gaffka v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Rudell v. Ogdensburg Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- McVean v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Powers v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Putnam v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Sanford v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Detroit United Ry. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.