Putnam v. Detroit United Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Charles Putnam against the Detroit United Railway for damages to his automobile and for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Defendant maintains a double-track street railway on Michigan avenue, in the city of Detroit. That street runs practically east and west. The northerly *343track carries the cars running west, and the southerly track those running east. Plaintiff, who was a wholesale dealer in flour, was, on the day of the accident, calling upon his customers, in doing which he used an old secondhand runabout automobile, capable of running not more than eight miles per hour. Plaintiff was, proceeding easterly along the south side of Michigan avenue. Desiring to call upon a customer on Harrison avenue, a street…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Chauvin v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Deneen v. Houghton County Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- McQuisten v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Donlin v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Stephens v. KoprowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Millette v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Strong v. KittengerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Prince v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.