Legal Opinion

Gaffka v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1906No. Docket No. 204PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Minnie Gaffka against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore,. J.

On the afternoon of October 24, 1901, the plaintiff was riding with her husband in a wagon going north upon St. Aubin avenue in the city of Detroit. A railway car belonging to the defendant, going east upon Forest avenue, struck the rear portion of the rear wheels of the wagon. As the result of it the plaintiff was injured. This suit is brought to recover damages for. those injuries. The circuit judge was of the opinion the plaintiff was not entitled to recover on account of her contributory negligence, and for that reason directed a verdict in favor of the defendant.

The important…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chauvin v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Geist v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McQuisten v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. La Londe v. Trans St. Mary's Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Seebach v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Travelers' Indemnity Co. v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API