State v. Bell
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUMMERS, Judge.
Appellant, Robert Bell, presents this appeal challenging his convictions and sentences. After a jury found appellant guilty of five counts of promoting prostitution, the trial court imposed five consecutive two-year sentences and ordered appellant to pay a fine of $3,000.00 as punishment for count five. The fine was recommended by the jury. Appellant does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence but alleges that his convictions are a result of the trial court’s erroneous refusal to suppress certain incriminating evidence. He further believes that the trial court erred…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WamreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Nygaard v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.