Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Wamre

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1999No. 980239, 980240PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jerrod Wamre and Burnette Wam-re appealed the denial of their suppression and severance motions. We conclude there was probable cause for the searches and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the severance requests. We affirm.

[If 2] Jerrod Wamre, Burnette Wamre, and Michael David Morton 1 were charged with numerous counts of burglary; possession of stolen property; sale of stolen property; theft of property; and removing or altering engine, serial, or identification numbers. Jerrod and Burnette Wamre each moved to suppress evidence obtained in the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. ThielingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. BallwegNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. AlbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API