Bishop v. Yeazle
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Fountain Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Assumpsit by the assignees against the administrator of the assignor of a promissory note. The declaration contains two counts. The first is special, the second is for money had and received. The first count avers the making of a promissory note by Cheadle and Hand to Lewellan, the defendant’s intestate, and the assignment of it by Lewellan to the plaintiffs; that a suit was commenced by the assignees against the makers, and judgment obtained against Hamd at the March term, 1839, of the Vermillion Circuit Court, being the first term after the assignment, and a return made of “not found” as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bank of the United States v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Hanna v. PeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
- Merriman v. MapleIndiana Supreme Court · 1830
- Farnham v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
3Cited by4 opinions
- Overturf v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
- Martin v. OrrIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Reiman v. Terre Haute Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Swiggett v. SeymourU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1868