Legal Opinion

Farnham v. Hay

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1833PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtM’Kinnry, J.

This is an action of debt. The declaration contains three counts. The .first demands 110 dollars, and is founded upon a writing obligatory, by which the defendant promised to pay the plaintiff the sum of 220 dollars, one half to be paid in one year, and the other half in two years from the date, with lawful interest. The sum thus demanded is the amount agreed to be paid in one year, it only having become due. The second is for the same amount, the half of 220 dollars borrowed of the plaintiff, and agreed to be paid in one and two years. The sum claimed in this count is also the amount agreed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tucker v. RandallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dillon v. State Bank of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Bishop v. YeazleIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
  3. Fontaine v. ArestaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · 1840

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API