Legal Opinion

Merriman v. Maple

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1830PublishedCited by 9 opinions

ERROR to the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

Assumpsit by the assignee of a sealed note against the- assignor. Plea, non-assumpsit; issue; and judgment for the plaintiff. Two other pleas were rejected on demurrer. We learn from the record, that the note was made by Skinner, payable to Merriman twelve months after date, and assigned by Merriman to Maple before it became due. The note became due on the eighth of August, 1821. On the tenth of September following, Maple sued out of the office of the Franklin Circuit Court a writ of capias ad respondendum against Skinner, returnable on the first Monday of October, which writ was returned non…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Kelsey v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
  3. Zekind v. NewkirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Overturf v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Thompson v. CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API