Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Pegg

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1822PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Assumpsit by Pegg, the assignee, against Hanna, the assignor, of a sealed note. There are three counts in the declaration: one upon the assignment; one for money laid out and expended ; and one for money had and received. There was a general demurrer to the first count, and judgment for the defendant below. To the other counts, the defendant pleaded the general issue. It appears from the record that Julian and Jones, on the 27th of November, 1818, executed a note under seal for the payment, of 383 dollars to Hanna or order, payable 12 months after date, for value received; that Hanna for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Pawling and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  3. Violett v. PattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  4. Clark v. Robert Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Page's Administrators v. Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1822

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Gillespie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Roberts v. MastersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Spears v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API