Legal Opinion

Denmon v. Runyon

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided October 28, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 92-2144-EEOPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EARL E. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for review of a magistrate’s order1 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) (Doc. # 116). Defendant opposes the motion.

On April 23, 1993, the magistrate entered an order denying plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint to assert a claim for compensatory damages and a jury trial pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (Doc. # 96). On June 14, 1993, the magistrate denied plaintiffs motion to reconsider its April 23, 1993, order (Doc. # 113).

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The standard of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Robert H. Ketchum v. Salvador Cruz, M.D., Spanish Peaks Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Sooner Products Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Colorado Visionary Academy v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
  2. Deghand v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  3. Sithon Maritime Co. v. Holiday MansionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  4. Murray v. SevierDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
  5. ADVANCED OPTICS ELECTRONICS, INC. v. RobinsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API