Legal Opinion

Sooner Products Co. v. McBride

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1983No. 81-1842PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Sooner Products Co. (Sooner) brought an action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986 (1976) against numerous defendants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), all defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The district court allowed Sooner to amend its complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). The defendants then moved to dismiss the amended complaint. On May 14, 1981, the district court granted the motions to dismiss in favor of all the defendants. On May…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Phillips v. MashburnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Hunt v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Phillips v. MashburnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API