Couch v. Southampton Civic Club
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDONALD, Chief Justice.
This is a case in which the meaning of restrictions imposed upon a residential area is the issue. Parties will be referred to as in the Trial Court. Southampton Civic Club et al. as plaintiffs filed seven separate suits against the defendants herein, to enjoin them from keeping roomers in their homes, alleging and contending that the keeping of roomers in homes located in the Southampton Addition, was violative of the restrictions incorporated in or contained in the deeds to the properties involved. The Trial Court consolidated all seven suits and tried same as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baddour v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Settegast v. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
- Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Jernigan v. CappsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Shaver v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Southampton Civic Club v. CouchTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Burkhart v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.