Legal Opinion

Southampton Civic Club v. Couch

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1958No. A-6929PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hickman

The sole question involved in this case is the construction and application of a certain restrictive covenant on Southampton Place Addition to the City of Houston. The respondents are home owners in the Addition. Seven suits were filed, one against respondent Couch and one against each of six other defendants. By order of the court they were consolidated and tried as one case. The relief sought in each case was to restrain the defendant therein from renting a room or rooms in his residence for lodging. Most of the lodgers are students in Rice Institute. The trial court held that as a matter…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. London Terrace, Inc. v. McAlisterTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Baddour v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Baker v. HendersonTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Couch v. Southern Methodist UniversityTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Eaton v. R. B. George Investment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Scott v. LiebmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API