Legal Opinion

Bear v. Bernstein

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 31, 1948No. 3 Div. 495PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The question is, does a restrictive covenant in a deed providing that the land shall be “used only for residential purposes * * * and that only one residence shall be erected on * * * [the] lot” prohibit the erection of a duplex or four-unit apartment house.

The cases are in irreconciliable conflict, some courts holding that such character of restriction is against plurality of use or occupancy, while others take the view that it is against plurality of houses or buildings.

While a number of courts hold to the first view, as did the learned trial court in this case, we think…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. UlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Madison Avenue Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Virgin v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Degnon Contracting Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Bennett v. . PetrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Tarr v. Timberwood Park Owners Ass'n, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. MacDonald v. PainterTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Slaby v. Mountain River Estates Residential Ass'nCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Springdale Gayfer's Store Co. v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Reetz v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API