Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. Bowen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1936No. 25527 and 25528PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

These cases resolve themselves into two propositions of law: First, do Sections 644 and 5438, General Code, or either of them, contravene the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States? Second, if these sections of the Code are constitutional, did the Superintendent of Insurance in refusing to renew relators’ licenses transcend the authority conferred upon him by such section of the Code?

The first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution reads as follows:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Holsman v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State Ex Rel. National Mutual Ins. v. ConnOhio Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Radiology Associates, Inc. v. Ohio Valley Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Upsey v. Secretary of RevenueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Gates v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Siegel v. Univ. of Cincinnati College of MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API