Legal Opinion

Champagne v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 7, 2011No. 2424, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrauser, C.J.

Having been found guilty by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Howard County of theft of property, specifically, a laptop computer, with a value of $500 or more, appellant, Devin James Champagne, claims that the evidence did not support a finding that the value of the stolen laptop computer was $500 or more at the time it was stolen. We agree and therefore vacate the judgment of the circuit court and, for the reasons set forth below, direct that a verdict of guilty of theft of property worth less than $500 be entered and that appellant then be sentenced on that conviction.

FACTS

On August…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Patterson CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Shelly v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API