Champagne v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtKrauser, C.J.
Having been found guilty by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Howard County of theft of property, specifically, a laptop computer, with a value of $500 or more, appellant, Devin James Champagne, claims that the evidence did not support a finding that the value of the stolen laptop computer was $500 or more at the time it was stolen. We agree and therefore vacate the judgment of the circuit court and, for the reasons set forth below, direct that a verdict of guilty of theft of property worth less than $500 be entered and that appellant then be sentenced on that conviction.
FACTS
On August…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Hagans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Pinkney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Patterson CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Shelly v. Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012