Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 3, 1989No. 60, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

We shall here hold that the evidence in this case was insufficient to establish that a lightweight toy plastic pistol was a deadly or a dangerous weapon within the meaning of Maryland Code (1987 Repl.Yol.) Article 27, • § 488. 1 The framework within which we reach this conclusion is straightforward.

On 22 December 1986 a Fotomat store in Baltimore City was robbed. The store clerk testified that the robber pulled up his shirt and showed her “a gun” tucked into the waistband of his trousers. She gave him money from the cash register because she believed “[t]hat if I didn’t give him…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Morris v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Duckworth v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Vincent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States v. Roger RedrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. Mosley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API