Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shelly v. Alabama Department of Corrections

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 2, 2012No. CR-11-1618Published

1DissentWindom, Presiding Judge

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Shelly is eligible to be classified as a “Class I Prisoner” under § 14-9-41 (e), Ala.Code 1975. Specifically, I believe that Shelly’s conviction for manslaughter, see § 13A-6-3, Ala.Code 1975, bars him from being eligible to receive Class I incentive-time deduction (hereinafter “good-time credit”) under § 14-9-41(e), Ala.Code 1975. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Initially, I note that:

“ ‘The fundamental rule of statutory construction is that this Court is to ascertain and effectuate the legislative intent as expressed in the statute. League of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Darks Dairy, Inc. v. Ala. Dairy Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Ex Parte BeverlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Ex Parte WaddailSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API