Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Masters

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 1971PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This appeal is from judgment of the circuit court on petitioner’s Writ of Review of action of the Board of County Commissioners for Washington County in awarding a sanitary service (for waste collection and disposal) certificate pursuant to Ordinance No. 59 of Washington County. The Board awarded petitioner substantially less than all of the territory for which he had applied. The petition attacked the ordinance on grounds that the county had no authority to enact the ordinance; that the ordinance provides no standards for the establishment of the service areas provided therein; that it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heer v. Department of Motor VehiclesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Four-County Metropolitan Capital Improvement District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State Highway Commission v. Clackamas Water DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Spencer v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Bell v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Marquam Investment Corp. v. BeersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. City of Estacada v. American Sanitary Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API