Legal Opinion

State v. Logsdon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2000No. 96CR0040; CA A95705PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained in violation of a provision of the Josephine County Charter, which forbids police to search private property without prior written consent or a search warrant. The trial court held that the charter provision is invalid and cannot therefore provide a basis for suppressing evidence in a criminal case. We agree with the trial court and affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. A paid, confidential…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kiernan v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kiernan v. Portland, OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. La Grande v. Municipal CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Lines v. City of MilwaukieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sims v. Besaw's CaféCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. GTE Northwest Inc. v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. GTE Northwest Inc. v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Sims v. Besaw's CaféCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Sims v. Besaw's CaféCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API