Legal Opinion

Independent Irr. Co., Ltd. v. Baldwin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellants, Independent Irrigation Company and its stockholders, brought this action against respondents, as watermaster of district No. 36 and commissioner of reclamation, respectively, for the purpose of enjoining the latter, their successors, agents, etc., from preventing the diversion by appellants of certain waters flowing in a natural channel known as Scott Slough, in Jefferson county, and to obtain a decree declaring appellants to be the owners of such waters.

The complaint alleges that appellants appropriated, and have continuously diverted and put to a beneficial use since a date…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Warring v. FreearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Pittock v. BuckIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Fischer v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Rees v. GorhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arkoosh v. Big Wood Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hopkins v. HemsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Bean v. KatsilometesIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Blue Creek Land & Livestock Co. v. Battle Creek Sheep Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Western Gas & Power of Idaho, Inc. v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API