Legal Opinion

Isse v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1999No. C5-98-1230PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge

A representative of the Commissioner of Economic Security reviewed sua sponte and reversed the decision of a reemployment insurance judge that relator did not commit misconduct and was therefore entitled to reemployment insurance benefits. Because we hold that relator did commit misconduct within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 268.095, subd. 6 (1998), we affirm.

FACTS

Relator Abdulahi Isse was employed by respondent Alamo Rent-a-Car, Inc., to clean cars. In January 1998, while relator was on an office phone making a medical appointment for his wife, a co-worker approached…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor OutletSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. McGowan v. Executive Express Transportation Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Oman v. Daig Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Potter v. Northern Empire Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Bray v. Dogs & Cats Ltd. (1997)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In Re Conservatorship of MalechaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Isse v. Alamo Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API