Isse v. Alamo Rent-A-Car
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge
A representative of the Commissioner of Economic Security reviewed sua sponte and reversed the decision of a reemployment insurance judge that relator did not commit misconduct and was therefore entitled to reemployment insurance benefits. Because we hold that relator did commit misconduct within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 268.095, subd. 6 (1998), we affirm.
FACTS
Relator Abdulahi Isse was employed by respondent Alamo Rent-a-Car, Inc., to clean cars. In January 1998, while relator was on an office phone making a medical appointment for his wife, a co-worker approached…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor OutletSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- McGowan v. Executive Express Transportation Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Oman v. Daig Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Potter v. Northern Empire Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Bray v. Dogs & Cats Ltd. (1997)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re Conservatorship of MalechaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Isse v. Alamo Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999