Legal Opinion

In Re Conservatorship of Malecha

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 14, 2000No. C7-99-1272PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Conservator Lawrence Malecha challenges the district court’s partial denial of attorneys’ and conservators’ fees, which was based on the court’s determination that conservatee Thomas Malecha was not indigent when the fees were earned. Because the asset-transfer provision under the medical-assistance statute is not a component of the definition of indigency under the conservatorship statute, we reverse.

FACTS

The district court appointed Lawrence Malecha conservator for his uncle, Thomas Malecha, on February 8, 1998. Thomas Malecha had lived independently on his Rice County…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nesler v. Fisher and Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Hepfel v. BashawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. City of St. Louis Park v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Conservatorship of MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Catherine C. Chapman, Protected Person.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API