Legal Opinion
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. Turnham
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 15, 1991No. C3-91-991PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Nicollet Restoration, Inc. challenges the district court’s dismissal of its action which was removed to district court from conciliation court, arguing that the Rules for the Conciliation Courts allow parties to choose whether to proceed with or without attorney representation in district court. We affirm the dismissal.
FACTS
On March 26, 1990, Nicollet Restoration, Inc. (Nicollet Restoration) brought action against Darcy Turnham doing business as Darcy Sales (Turnham) in Hennepin County Conciliation Court for breach of a commercial tenancy agreement. After…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Cary Company v. F.E. Satterlee CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Wilkie v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Reichel v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Wicker Enterprises, Inc. v. DahlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. TurnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992