Legal Opinion

Reichel v. Hefner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1991No. C2-90-2589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Bryan S. Reichel and a corporation controlled by him (“Reichel”) obtained a default judgment against Paul Hefner and Sharon R. Yackley (“Hefner”) in conciliation court. Hefner attempted to remove that action to district court. This appeal raises the question of the propriety of service of the purported removal. We affirm.

FACTS

Reichel paid Hefner $1,465 as advance expenses to broker a $3.5 million construction loan. After Hefner failed to broker the loan, Reichel commenced an action against him in conciliation court for the return of the advance expenses. Reichel obtained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilkie v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roehrdanz v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Wilkins v. City of GlencoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Roehrdanz v. BrillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. TurnhamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Roehrdanz v. BrillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API