Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1919No. 23,506PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Fulton Circuit Court; Smith N. Stevens, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Henry Smith. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.

— In this prosecution of appellant upon an indictment for assault and battery with intent to kill, the court sustained a demurrer to appellant’s plea in abatement.

1. The plea alleged that one member of the grand jury regularly called was excused, and that a substitute member was, at the direction of the court, called by the sheriff from among the bystanders, and was sworn as a member of the jury. A jury so or- ■ ganized is irregular and cannot return an indictment *503which will stand when properly attacked. See Stipp v. State (1917), 187 Ind. 211, 118 N. E. 818. A plea in abatement setting up…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. ComerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Rice v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Rush v. Foos Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Stipp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Randolph v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Fenwick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Souerdike v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Price v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API