Fenwick v. State

Appellant, in the court below, was convicted of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor to one Henry Foreman. §1, Acts 1921 p. 736. The overruling of his motion for a new trial is the only error relied on for a reversal of the judgment rendered against him.

While appellant’s motion for a new trial contains twenty-four specifications, he here urges but three of them, namely: Illegally selected petit jury for the April term of the Delaware Circuit Court, at which term and before which jury appellant was tried; error of the court in admitting certain evidence; and want of evidence to support…