Legal Opinion

Wertz v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 18, 2008No. CR 07-1155PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul E. Danielson, Justice.

Appellant Steven Wertz appeals from his convictions on two counts of capital murder and his sentence of death. He asserts four points on appeal: (1) that the evidence did not sufficiently corroborate the accomplice testimony; (2) that the jury erred in finding the existence of an aggravator during the sentencing phase; (3) that the jury erred in finding no mitigating circumstance; and (4) that various considerations should be taken into account during this court’s review pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure — Criminal 10 (2008). We affirm Wertz’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Burley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Dunn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wertz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Nooner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Dimas-Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API