Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 20, 2011No. CR 10-703PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JIM GUNTER, Justice.

| TAppellant appeals his conviction for capital murder and argues that the circuit court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict because the State failed to sufficiently corroborate the testimony of his alleged accomplice. Because this is a criminal appeal in which life imprisonment has been imposed, this court has jurisdiction pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1 — 2(a)(2). We affirm.

In an amended felony information filed June 27, 2008, appellant was charged with, inter alia, the crime of capital murder in the death of Odilon Guerrero. A jury trial was held on March 2,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strong v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Boldin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Stephenson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Wertz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API