Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Superior Court of Riverside County

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1899No. S.F. No. 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of mandate from the Supreme Court to the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. S. Noyes, . Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

—This is an application for a writ of mandate commanding the superior court of Riverside county to entertain the motion of petitioner to vacate and set aside an injunction granted hy decree in the case of J. S. Smith and others v. Stearns Ranchos Company et al., and if it shall appear that petitioner has presented to each of the plaintiffs a certain hill or statement, “then to vacate and set aside the injunction granted,” et cetera.

Suit was brought hy numerous plaintiffs against the Stearns Ranchos Company, a corporation, and I. D. Rogers for an injunction to restrain defendants from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Heinlen v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bliss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Clute v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McCann v. Union Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Estate of LanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API