Legal Opinion
Jacobsen v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1923No. S. F. No. 10771PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
The petitioners herein apply for a writ of prohibition directed to the Superior Court of the County of Sonoma and to Honorable B. L. Thompson, one of the judges thereof, prohibiting the said court and the judge thereof from proceeding to try a certain action pending in said court and from rendering any final judgment therein and from enforcing a temporary injunction heretofore issued therein and from making and entering any further order or issuing any further writ or other process having the effect of restraining these petitioners from preventing the plaintiff in said…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Dewey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- R. J. Widen Company v. The United States and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.