Legal Opinion
Boothby v. Town of Yreka City
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1931No. Docket No. 4366PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Plaintiff had judgment in this action against both the Town of Yreka City and County of Siskiyou, from which judgment the Town of Yreka City appeals.
The record shows that for some time prior to the sixth day of November, 1928, the appellant had maintained a certain building within the corporate limits of the City of Yreka, known as “Engine House No. 2”. This building was situate within voting precinct No. 5 of the county of Siskiyou. The plaintiff in this action was a duly qualified voter of the County of Siskiyou, residing within voting precinct No. 5. Prior to the sixth day of November,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Beeson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Dennis v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Larson v. Calder's Park Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- Beaman v. GroomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Goodman v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Burroughs v. Ben's Auto Park, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.