W. J. Gilmore Drug Co. v. Goldsmith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The plaintiff brought an action in the county court. The defendant’s liability as shown by the plaintiff’s evidence arose out of three obligations in writing, dated respectively: March 7, 1916; April 25, 1916; July 1, 1916. They were similar in form except as to the amount involved; the first being for $150, the second for $200 and the third for $250. They were given as a guaranty to the plaintiff for the payment of bills for drugs, etc., sold by the latter to the Broadway Drug Co'., conducted by J. M. Goldsmith, a relative of the defendant. One of the conditions of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jamestown & Franklin R. R. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Son v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Mange-Wiener Co. v. Patton Worsham Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Gardiner v. D. P. S. Nichols Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marquette-Bailey Lumber Co. v. GibboneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Doll v. RyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co. v. GaudelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Cain v. MarickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Young v. United States Housing Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.