Marquette-Bailey Lumber Co. v. Gibboney
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
Tbe plaintiff sold to tbe defendant a quantity of lumber. The contract consisted of an order in writing from the defendant and an ¡acceptance in writing by the plaintiff. The subject of the contract was a car load of Wisconsin white pine which was ordered by a letter dated February 21, 1923. The letter contained an order for one-half car of Idaho white pine, but this was not filled because of a lack of the material answering the description in the order. That part of the order relating to the subject of the controversy was in these words: “Also, please enter our order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buffington v. QuantinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
- Son v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Mange-Wiener Co. v. Patton Worsham Drug Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Estes v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- W. J. Gilmore Drug Co. v. GoldsmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- C. D. Brown Co., Inc. v. Stand. H. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Doll v. RyderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co. v. GaudelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Cain v. MarickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- C. Trevor Dunham, Inc. v. Pursel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.