Legal Opinion
Doll v. Ryder
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 1935No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff is a partnership engaged in the business of selling advertising service. On July 3, 1930, acting through Waldo R. Sager, employed on a commission basis, with authority to solicit business, it entered into a contract with A. M. Ryder, representing Ryder’s Dairy, for the furnishing of certain advertising materials, etc. The contract contained the following pertinent provisions:
“The term of this contract shall be for a period of ONE YEAR from date of first shipment and this contract shall be deemed renewed for a further period of one year......unless at least…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McClelland v. RushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Collins v. Home Ins. Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Fee v. Adams Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Jamestown & Franklin R. R. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Son v. GorsuchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stretcher v. GreggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. SabelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Foell Packing Co. v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Delaware Ex Rel. General Crushed Stone Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943