Legal Opinion
Hemenway & Moser Co. v. Funk
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1940No. 6174PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Chief Justice.
This action was brought in the District Court of the Third Judicial District of the State of Utah, in and for Salt Lake County, by appellants against respondents under the declaratory judgment statute, R. S. U. 1933, Title 104, Chapter 64, Sections 1 to 13.
The purpose of the action is to have determined, as between the parties hereto, the construction of certain parts of the Liquor Control Act. Laws of Utah 1935, Chap. 43, as amended by Laws of Utah 1937, Chap. 49, as further amended by Laws of Utah 1939, Chap. 60. The trial court found in accordance with the contention…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. KallasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- One Hudson Super-Six Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Utah Liquor Control Commission v. WoorasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. One 1988 Ford Coupe Vin 1FABP41A9JF143651Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. One 1958 Plymouth SedanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- United States v. DykesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
- Utah Liquor Control Commission v. MandelesUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Aranofsky v. GrupposoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.