Legal Opinion

Utah Liquor Control Commission v. Mandeles

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1940No. 6227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

The District Court of the Third Judicial District of this State dismissed a libel of information filed by the Utah Liquor Control Commission against certain personal property seized in a barroom in Magna, Utah. The Commission has appealed the case. The respondents have not filed a brief in this court.

The property was seized pursuant to the provisions of Section 165 of the Liquor Control Act of this State, Laws 1935, c. 43, as amended by Laws 1937, c. 49. That section contemplates a seizure “when a violation of any provision of this act shall occur in the presence of” the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ingle v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Utah Liquor Control Commission v. WoorasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Hemenway & Moser Co. v. FunkUtah Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KoonceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API