Legal Opinion
Vroom, Inc.; Vroom Automotive, LLC d/b/a Vroom, d/b/a Texas Direct Auto; Carstory, LLC; and Vast.com, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 6, 2026No. 2:21-cv-06737Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY VROOM, INC.; VROOM AUTOMOTIVE, LLC d/b/a/ VROOM, d/b/a TEXAS DIRECT AUTO; CARSTORY, LLC; and No, 21-cv-6737 VAST,COM, INC.,, d/b/a/ CARSTORY. OPINION Plaintiffs, v. SIDEKICK TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Defendant. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J: Before the Court is Plaintiffs Vroom, Inc.; Vroom Automotive, LLC; Carstory, LLC; and Vast.com, Inc. (collectively, “Vroom”) and Defendant Sidekick Technology, Inc.’s (“Sidekick”) “Joint Motion for an Indicative Ruling Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1 on a Joint Motion to Vacate under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Budget Blinds, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. PaigeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Ehrheart v. Verizon WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.