Budget Blinds, Inc. v. White
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider whether a federal district court properly relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) to vacate a default judgment entered by another district court. We conclude that it did not, and we will remand so that it may consider whether to set aside the default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4).
I
Budget Blinds, Inc. (“BBI”) is a California corporation that franchises mobile window covering businesses throughout the United States. According to an affidavit that BBI’s Chief Operating Officer filed with the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Jermont Cox v. Martin HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Elizabeth Harvey v. Peter LoftusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Milad Allaham v. Fadi NaddafCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Kenneth Hasson v. Fullstory IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.