Legal Opinion
Ehrheart v. Verizon Wireless
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 15, 2010No. 08-4323PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
I
We focus in this appeal on the parameters of a district court’s role in reviewing class action settlements. The factual and procedural background is straightforward. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., prohibits a seller from printing a receipt that displays more than the last five digits of a buyer’s credit or debit card and/or the expiration date of the credit or debit card. 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g)(1). The Appellants claimed that Verizon Wireless violated these provisions and filed a class action lawsuit…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- In Re Pet Food Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- John Rodriguez v. Natl City BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Shameca Robertson v. Allied Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance v. SquiresCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.