Legal Opinion

Federal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 11, 1963No. 49874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

This action for a declaratory judgment arose in these circumstances: In September 1956, Paddy Miles was employed by Lloyd Brooks, an employer subject to the workmen’s compensation law. Brooks’ liability under the law was insured in the plaintiff’s predecessor American Farmers Mutual Insurance Company. On September 11, 1956, Paddy sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment by Brooks and in November 1957 a referee of the Division of Workmen’s Compensation made separate “Findings of Fact” and an “Award on Hearing.” In his findings of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christy v. PetrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Claim of Mastrodonato v. Pfaudler Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Crites v. Missouri Dry Dock and Repair CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Sommers v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Claim of Wason v. PrattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meilves v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Stewart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. Grant v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Vogel v. Hall Implement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Lozier Corp. & Liberty Mutual Insurance v. StateNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API