Legal Opinion
Claim of Mastrodonato v. Pfaudler Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1954PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Ch. J.
On this appeal, arising out of a workmen’s compensation proceeding, we are concerned only with a claim by the. employer and insurance carrier for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 8, par. [d]).*
The claimant, Peter Mastrodonato, was employed as a “ saw man” by the Pfaudler Company of Rochester, New York — makers of “ glass enamel lined steel equipment.” He was injured on August 6,1945, in an industrial accident when a steel *595pipe fell from a truck, pulling him down in its descent. The resulting injury to the employee was a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Schurick v. Bayer Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Claim of De Maroney v. Bennett Junior CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of Mastrodonato v. Pfaudler Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by21 opinions
- Acevedo v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Claim of Ryciak v. Eastern Precision ResistorNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Gorman Carter v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Federal Mutual Insurance Co. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Claim of Engle v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.